Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (34.14GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
504 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 12W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB +2682%
0.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Mar 2023
NVS Mobile
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
LPDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
34.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
4
8
Shading Units
512
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
16
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1280 GFLOPS
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
640.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
320.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GA10B
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
Unknown
86 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy