Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 35W)
NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
184 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M +1317%
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Aug 2014
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
192
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GK107
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

12W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy