Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 16GB VRAM Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1597MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
5112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB +70986%
16.35 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Nov 2019
NVS Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1245 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1597 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
80
8
Shading Units
5120
4
TMUs
320
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
204.4 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
511.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.71 TFLOPS
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.35 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
8.177 TFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GV100
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy