Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (11.20GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
Lower TDP (12W vs 23W)
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Released 9 months late

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M +9%
0.023 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
May 2009
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
1
8
Shading Units
8
4
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

12W
TDP
23W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
G98
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy