Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 260W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4592 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16 +44244%
12.86 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro NVS
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
72
16
Shading Units
4608
8
TMUs
288
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
401.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
25.71 TFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.86 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
401.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

21W
TDP
260W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy