Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 2GB VRAM Quadro M1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 40W)
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Quadro M1000M +3406%
1.017 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.89 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.78 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1017 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
31.78 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-Q1-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

21W
TDP
40W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy