Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3824 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Quadro P6000 +43451%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro Pascal
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1506 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5X
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
432.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
30
16
Shading Units
3840
8
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
157.9 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
197.4 GFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
394.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

21W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GP102
-
GPU Variant
GP102-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy