CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
VS
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128MB VRAM Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
Score
Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16
VS
Arctic Sound 2T
Graphics Card
Feb 2006
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro NVS
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
250 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
7680
8
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
120
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
NV43
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
NVS440 NPB
GPU Variant
-
Curie
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
110 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.146 billion
Transistors
8 billion
154 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Board Design
31W
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.5
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16
2
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16
3
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
4
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16
5
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M
6
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16
7
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100
8
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m
9
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 vs NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
10
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy