Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128MB VRAM Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2006
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro NVS
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
250 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
7680
8
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
120
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

NV43
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
NVS440 NPB
GPU Variant
-
Curie
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
110 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.146 billion
Transistors
8 billion
154 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

31W
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy