Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1480MHz vs 1114MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS
Quadro M6000 +125%
6.844 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1076 MHz
Base Clock
988 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
384bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
3072
64
TMUs
192
40
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
213.9 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
GM200
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy