Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 Mobile and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1582MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P5000 Mobile +1302%
6.48 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1278 MHz
Base Clock
-
1582 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
24
2048
Shading Units
192
128
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

101.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
202.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
101.2 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.480 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
202.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GT200B
N17E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy