Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 121% (1733MHz vs 784MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.5GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 180W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P5000 +321%
8.873 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1607 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1733 MHz
Boost Clock
784 MHz
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.5GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
1344
160
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

110.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
277.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
138.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.873 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
277.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Board Design

180W
TDP
108W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GK104
GP104-875-A1
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy