Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Quadro 500M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Quadro 500M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1824 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh +1869%
5.299 TFLOPS
Quadro 500M
0.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

945 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
2
1920
Shading Units
96
120
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
4
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
165.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
10.60 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
165.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
GF108
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
GPU Variant
N12M-Q3
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy