Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh +1046%
5.299 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

945 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
24
1920
Shading Units
192
120
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
24
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
165.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
10.60 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
165.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
GT200B
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy