Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 247W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh +415%
5.299 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

945 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
14
1920
Shading Units
448
120
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
48
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
165.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
10.60 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
165.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
247W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
GF110
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
3 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy