Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1545MHz
Lower TDP (160W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 416.0GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000
7.119 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T +55%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1005 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

36
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
6144
144
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
96
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
14.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
222.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
TU104-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
8 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

160W
TDP
350W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy