Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000 +1586%
7.119 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1005 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
36
SM Count
4
2304
Shading Units
192
144
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
14.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
222.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
55W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
GF106
TU104-850-A1
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy