Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
2272 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000 +10525%
7.119 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1005 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
36
SM Count
4
2304
Shading Units
32
144
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
14.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
222.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

160W
TDP
42W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
G84
TU104-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy