Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla S1070

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla S1070

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
2064 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (160W vs 800W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000 +1044%
7.119 TFLOPS
Tesla S1070
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1005 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
36
SM Count
30
2304
Shading Units
240
144
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
14.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
222.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
800W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
GT200B
TU104-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy