Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh vs Intel Arctic Sound M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Boost Clock1545MHz
Lower TDP (110W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
9.492 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M +55%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
8192
192
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
128
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
296.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
18.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
9.492 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
296.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

110W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

TU104B
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy