Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
3024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 110W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh +7374%
9.492 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
6
3072
Shading Units
48
192
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
296.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
18.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.492 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
296.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

110W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU104B
GPU Name
G94
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy