Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
4496 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +5232%
14.93 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1230 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
14
4608
Shading Units
112
288
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
16
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

155.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
466.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
29.86 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.93 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
466.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

260W
TDP
78W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
G92
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy