NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 vs AMD Instinct MI300X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (2100MHz vs 1650MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
18560 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
2.957 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X
+5425%
163.4 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2020
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
19456
56
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
92.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
5.914 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
2.957 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
92.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
750W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117B
GPU Name
MI300
N19P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
146 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
