Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock1620MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3.318 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T +233%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1751 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
6144
64
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

51.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
103.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
6.636 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
3.318 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
103.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
350W
-
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy