Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile +3051%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy