Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs AMD FirePro M4150

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs AMD FirePro M4150

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M4150 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
FirePro M4150 +42%
0.549 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Oct 2013
Embedded
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.720 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.16 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
549.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.32 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
Opal
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy