Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 60W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E4690 MXM +100%
0.384 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 160M
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Mar 2009
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 100M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
4
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
64
32
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
G94
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
GPU Variant
N10E-GS1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
60W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy