Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 115W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1890MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
2752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile +2923%
11.61 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Jan 2023
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1545 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1890 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
24
4
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
3072
32
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
90.72 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
181.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
11.61 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.61 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
181.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
AD107
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
GPU Variant
GN21-X4
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
Unknown
146 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
115W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy