Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E6465 vs AMD FirePro M8900

AMD Radeon E6465 vs AMD FirePro M8900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon E6465 and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E6465 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E6465
0.192 TFLOPS
FirePro M8900 +580%
1.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2015
Release Date
Apr 2011
Embedded
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
12
160
Shading Units
960
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Caicos
GPU Name
Blackcomb
-
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.37 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy