Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9173 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

AMD Radeon E9173 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon E9173 PCIe and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9173 PCIe 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1219MHz vs 1038MHz)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
Lower TDP (10W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9173 PCIe +56%
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2017
Release Date
Unknown
Embedded
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1124 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
512
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
GP108B
E9170
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Pascal
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy