Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD FirePro M5800

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD FirePro M5800

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1904 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM +1021%
5.834 TFLOPS
FirePro M5800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Mar 2010
Embedded
Generation
FirePro Mobility
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
-
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
400
144
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

95W
TDP
26W
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Madison
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
Madison XT GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy