Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro S7150

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro S7150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 +2142%
3.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Feb 2016
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Tonga
-
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
5 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy