Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro S9000

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro S9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro S9000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1672 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
FirePro S9000 +1820%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Aug 2012
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
1792
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy