Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3976 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +4654%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Mar 2016
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Capsaicin
-
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy