Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro W600

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
392 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
FirePro W600 +357%
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy