Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro W7000

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro W7000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
FirePro W7000 +1347%
2.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy