Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 750W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
19336 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI325X +48542%
81.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Oct 2024
Radeon R600
Generation
Radeon Instinct(MIx)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
19456
8
TMUs
1216
4
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
750W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
153 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy