Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3464 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V320 +6298%
10.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Jun 2017
Radeon R600
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
852 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
3584
8
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
230W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy