Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R7 240

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
200 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240 +197%
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Oct 2013
Radeon R600
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
20
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

45W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Oland
-
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy