Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A4000H

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A4000H

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM RTX A4000H to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 140W)
NVIDIA RTX A4000H 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
6024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
RTX A4000H +11310%
19.17 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
Radeon R600
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
48
120
Shading Units
6144
8
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
140W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
GA104
-
GPU Variant
GA104-???-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy