Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs ATI FirePro V3700

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs ATI FirePro V3700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition +162%
0.168 TFLOPS
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Aug 2008
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
15.20GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
40
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

45W
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RV620 GL (215-0670004)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy