Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs ATI FirePro V3700

ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs ATI FirePro V3700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
280 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 PRO +500%
0.384 TFLOPS
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Aug 2008
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
15.20GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
40
16
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

200W
TDP
32W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
RV620
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
RV620 GL (215-0670004)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy