Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT vs AMD FirePro S9150

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XT and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (215W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 106.0GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 XT
0.476 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150 +964%
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Aug 2014
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
828 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
512bit
106.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2816
16
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
11.89 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
475.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

215W
TDP
235W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Hawaii
R600 XT (215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy