Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 3750 vs AMD FireStream 9170

ATI Radeon HD 3750 vs AMD FireStream 9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 3750 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 3750 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Lower TDP (65W vs 105W)
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.33GB/s vs 22.18GB/s)
200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 3750
0.191 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170 +160%
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Nov 2007
Radeon R600
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
693 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.18GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.184 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
6.368 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
191.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
105W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV635
GPU Name
RV670
RV635 PRO (215-0682008)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.378 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
135 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy