Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1776 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition +8091%
2.867 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Oct 2009
Southern Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1792
Shading Units
16
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
89.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.867 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
716.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

200W
TDP
31W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GT216
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy