Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 8350 OEM and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 90W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 8350 OEM
0.104 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +2639%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2013
Release Date
Jun 2020
Sea Islands
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
667 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
10.67GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
80
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
5.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
104.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

19W
TDP
90W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cedar
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy