Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
6080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI210 +2905%
22.63 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

64GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1638GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

104
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
6656
Shading Units
576
416
TMUs
48
0
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
707.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
181.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GK104
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy