Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Quadro P400

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Quadro P400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 and 2GB VRAM Quadro P400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 36% (1700MHz vs 1252MHz)
More VRAM (64GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 32.06GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI210 +3430%
22.63 TFLOPS
Quadro P400
0.641 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2021
Release Date
Feb 2017
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1228 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1252 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

64GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1638GB/s
Bandwidth
32.06GB/s

Render Config

104
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
6656
Shading Units
256
416
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.03 GPixel/s
707.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.03 GTexel/s
181.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.02 GFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
641.0 GFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.03 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
30W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GP107
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
GP107-825-KA-A1
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
N/A
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy