Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro 600

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro 600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
13216 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250 +18298%
45.26 TFLOPS
Quadro 600
0.246 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Dec 2010
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
208
Compute Units
-
13312
Shading Units
96
832
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.560 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.24 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
245.8 GFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.48 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GF108
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
Unknown
Die Size
116 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
40W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy