CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470
VS
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
NVIDIA Quadro FX 470
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 0System Shared VRAM Quadro FX 470 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
13296 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 470 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250
+100477%
45.26 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 470
0.045 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250
VS
Quadro FX 470
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Sep 2007
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
System Shared
HBM2e
Memory Type
System Shared
8192bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
SM Count
1
208
Compute Units
-
13312
Shading Units
16
832
TMUs
8
0
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.640 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
C79
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
-
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
Unknown
Die Size
144 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
38W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla X2070 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
2
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
3
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
4
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
5
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
6
NVIDIA GRID M60 4A vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
7
NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
8
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090
9
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20X
10
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Tesla M40
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy