Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300 and 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
13840 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (189W vs 600W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300 +7596%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5800
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Nov 2008
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
512bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

220
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
14080
Shading Units
240
880
TMUs
80
0
ROPs
32
880
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

600W
TDP
189W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
153 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy